Thursday, 24 April 2025

Hindutva in Indian politics!

I don't have an idea where to start when I see all the different reactions on social media on Pahalgam terrorist attack! Among them, a group of people have a uniformity-in demonizing Muslims. To say anti-Muslim is not the right word. Those uniform reactions want to eradicate Muslims.
Already, in the form of a social media post that can quickly influence your subconscious, especially one received via WhatsApp, with the effortless of a neuroscientist or someone with a PhD in genetics, one may have told you about the innate religiosity or extremist mentality of Muslims. Many of you may have swallowed it without thinking about it. Some may have just listened or glanced at it, without realizing that it had entered your very being! From those who cannot write the full alphabets to those who have attained academic ‘scholarship’, may have ‘enlightened’ you already.

In Pahalgam, as far as we know, it was Muslim terrorists who took the lives of innocent civilians.
There is no mention here of the Union Government's security lapses, intelligence failures, or the rhetoric of the authorities after the abrogation of Article 370.
Let us come to terrorism, religion, and some politics.

What is terrorism, sir?

The image of a Muslim picking up stones to carrying missile launchers will now be clear in your mind! If such an image has appeared in your mind, you know nothing about terrorism. But it has been proven that you are a religious fanatic.

We have heard the philosophy that terrorism has no religion and terrorists have no religion. Terrorism in the name of religion is religious terrorism! It was Islamic terrorism that took the lives of civilians in Pahalgam yesterday! It is because terrorists use religion that we say that such terrorists and terrorism have religion. But more than religion, terrorism is a political product. United States of America is the number one terrorist country in the world. They unleash Monopoly Capitalist terrorism on other countries. Terrorism is fundamentally an act of coercion. It uses force and weapons to compel other people to obey and live as they say.

Most liberals in India must have risen like lions after hearing the news of a terrorist attack in Pahalgam yesterday. Not going back to 1925 and not going back to 2014. If you had known what was happening in Indian society in the last one or two years, you fox wouldn't have had to wear the mask like a lion. You have been unaware of the terrorism called Hindutva that attacks Muslims, Christians, Dalits, Adivasis, women, Buddhists and Jains in the name of religion (yes, just like the terrorists who came with weapons yesterday). It has not yet struck you as terrorism. You have never heard of the Hindutva terrorism that is taking place, by holding Muslims, old and young, regardless of age or gender, and making them chant ‘Jai Shri Ram’, harassing and killing them if they deny, and then demolishing their houses with bulldozers, killing people in the name of the animal called cow, raping and murdering Dalit girls on a daily basis, branding tribals as Maoists and shooting them dead thus helping corporates to exploit natural resources, taking over the Buddhist monastery in Bodh Gaya and destroying the Jain monastery in Maharashtra, right? Especially since 2014, the state-sponsored terrorism that has been taking place!

Terrorism is never defined anywhere as a crime committed by a Muslim, you jackals! Rise up, you ‘blue jackals’!

What connection do Muslims in India have with the terrorist activities taking place in Pahalgam, Central Asia or anywhere else in the world? Just because someone is born into Islam and is a Muslim does not make them terrorists. America and the Zionists have been cooking that shit for 3 decades! It has been 100 years since the Sangh Parivar, the Nazi-fascist organizations, made Muslim extermination its main life goal. Since 1925 in fact. There's something Richard Dawkins said a few years ago. When the Taliban drove United States of America out of Afghanistan and turned Afghanistan into an Islamic terrorist state. He said, "In all Abrahamic religions (Holy books), there is some good and some bad. When you take the bad literally and apply it to society, you get 'a Taliban'!" I, who completely against all organized religions, am only saying this about Islam to make it clear 'what it is milk and what is water'. It is not that Islam or any other organized religion is milk, but the majority of people who are born into it and follow a religion by chance are milk, not extremists or fundamentalists. All Semitic religions fall within the definition of religion given by Arthur Schopenhauer. That is, "Religion is the masterpiece of the art of animal training, for it trains people as to how they shall think", said the German thinker Schopenhauer.

In our India and China, there were never any Abrahamic model religions. Here in the East, there were only investigations, searchings. In the East, at the maximum, there was only the method of taking everything and tying it to ‘Brahmam’(Before the Abrahamic religions, Babylon, Egypt and Indian subcontinent were flourished with realistic, materialistic searches and thoughtful enquiries). The Abrahamic method of tying the origin of all the characteristics to one God can be seen only in the Bhagavad Gita. The Gita was later added to the Mahabharata. The Jain-Buddhist-Taoist thoughts present here do not accept God at all. These three ways of thinking did not create myths/superstitious  stories to exploit people. Therefore, these three are not animal training schools like the Abrahamic religions. It was with Savarkar's writing of the book 'Essentials of Hindutva' in 1923 that the attempt to establish the Abrahamic model religion in the Indian subcontinent, east of Central Asia, began.

The specialty of Abrahamic religions is that they are just fictional stories. Just myths. Stories of an incarnation (son of God) born from a virgin mother to conquer enemies are a regular feature of such religions. The birth and story of Krishna in the Indian subcontinent is of this kind. But a religion centered on Krishna did not arise in this land, in this land that Mahavira and Buddha had ploughed with logic. Krishna became just a story that we like! Then, after apologizing to the British and coming out of prison, Savarkar wrote Hindutva, making Rama a historical figure. In it, he himself says that Hindutva and Hinduism are not the same (fools, without even knowing that, are trying to establish that both are one thing). Even before Valmiki composed the Ramayana, many Rama stories(Ramakadhas) were popular in the subcontinent. Moreover, in Valmiki's Ramayana, Rama is just a king. Valmiki is called the Aadi kavi, early poet, an author. He was not an early historian. Later, it was Tulsidas who, during the Bhakti movement, for the first time made Rama as the incarnation of God in his work 'Ramacharitamanas'.

In a story, there is a hero on one side and a villain on the other. Or good on one side and evil on the other. All Abrahamic religions are stories woven into this paradigm. For all of them, others/those who do not believe in their story are enemies. Whether Jesus said to love your neighbor as yourself or not, it is history that Christianity carried out the most brutal manhunt the world has ever seen. In Hindustan(meaning east of Indus river), however, stories were seen as just stories. Although many of the stories became idols after the Jain-Buddhist period! Jain-Buddhist thoughts did not create any stories. They dominated the Brahminical thoughts which discriminated people into the form of good and the form of evil (Brahmanism, the mother of world exploitation, which divided people into good and evil stories in Hindustan a thousand years before the rise of Abrahamic religions) and kept the subcontinent at the peak of human achievements (of that time) for a thousand years.

A person's worldview determines how they respond to society. After the 18th and 19th centuries, we can see the Western world moving away from religion and towards a new system of politics. It was during this time that people came together around ideas like democracy and republic and nations rose. In the last 100-200 years, Western countries have made tremendous scientific progress. But with the British establishing their dominance in India, the situation of separating people on the basis of religion was introduced for the first time in the Indian subcontinent under their ‘divide and rule’ policy. A continuation of this was the emergence of All-India Muslim League in 1906, Hindu Mahasabha in 1915, Savarkar’s idea called ‘Hindutva’ in 1923 and the establishment of the RSS in 1925. The ultimate goal of these organizations(except AIML, because Islam was already here)was to establish a religion in India like the Abrahamic religions mentioned earlier. The Sangh Parivar targets ‘trained animals’ that dance to their ideology and rhythm. Hindutva and the RSS have a history of directly visiting and taking inspiration from the Nazis and fascists, and learning their organizational structure. This is an organization that has been actively operating in India, both covertly and openly, for the last 100 years. This was the first time in the world that an organization had started its work by defining internal enemies. It continues its work even today without being declared a terrorist organization. RSS is not an organization that works on the idea of democratic-sovereign-republics, which are modern systems. It follows the idea of alienation that follows centuries-old Abrahamic ideas and thousand-year-old Brahminical ideas. To create internal enemies is to create internal division. Creating internal division is the essence of Brahminism. That is what divided the people of ancient India into four varnas, made them Avarnas and made them untouchables rejecting even the status of humans! A program that breeds internal division among those living in their own land.

It is under the influence of this that those living with us today are drawn to the idea that one group on earth is good and another group is evil, to the Abrahamic idea, to the Brahmanic idea, and accordingly have a worldview. These people are unable to see the attack in Pahalgam as an attack on India from outside India. If we do not view the world through a mythical story with good on one side and evil on the other, and if we do not view the people of the world as good on one side and bad the other side, but rather study and understand this earth, its people, and their history, we can end this racial and religious hatred.

To these Indian Nazis and their subjects, who see the Pahalgam attack as an asset to portray some as the embodiment of evil, we must say that you should not view the current world through the lens of the Medieval stories , but rather view the world with a sense of reality.

Now, let the expert who was sitting next to you and has instilled in your head the innate extremism and character traits of Muslims know, and you know,
Modern science has not yet found that a person is born with a specific character trait of a particular caste or religion. It is DNA that makes a person 'that person'. What can I say to you fools who believe that myths(religious, caste stories)have crept in DNA and are passed down from generation to generation? Moreover, modern science has debunked such nonsense. With a medieval brain, you fool’s birth is just to spread poison in this 21st century!
Today, we have a better social situation that many people in many countries have fought for and achieved, even sacrificing their lives, against a lot of misinformation and nonsense. No matter how many of you are, if you try to drag this society back and bring it closer together with your medieval brains, we have to say that we will not stand by and watch!
Long live the revolution!

No comments:

Post a Comment